On this day in 1640, Archbishop William Laud was arrested, and wrote in his diary:
“I was accused by the House of Commons for high treason, without any particular charge laid against me … . Soon after, the charge was brought into the Upper House [of Lords] … . I was presently committed to the Gentleman Usher, but was permitted to go in his company to my house in Lambeth for … such papers as pertained to my defence … . I stayed in Lambeth till the evening to avoid the gazing of the people … . As I went to my barge, hundreds of my poor neighbours stood there and prayed for my safety and return to my house, for which I bless God and them”.
Laud was later imprisoned in the Tower of London, early in 1641. After the outbreak of the Civil War in 1642, he was tried for and convicted of high treason in the House of Lords, in 1643-4, and eventually executed on Tower Hill, in 1645 (*).
He had previously been made Bishop of London in 1628, and Archbishop of Canterbury in 1633, and become known for his “High Church” views, and his fierce opposition to and persecution of Puritans (*).
Tower Hill, where Laud was executed, is visited on various of our walks, including the “Rebellious London” themed special
Further details of all our walks are available in the Our Guided Walks section of this web-site.
Bookings may be made through the “Contact/Booking” section of the web-site, or by e-mail (firstname.lastname@example.org).
(*) Among the charges levelled against him were:
“That, by false erroneous doctrines, and other sinister ways and means, he went about to subvert religion, established in this kingdom, and to set up popery and superstition in the church … .
[…] That to suppress preaching, he hath suspended divers good and honest ministers, and hath used unlawful means, by letters, and otherwise, to set all bishops to suppress them.
[…] That, to save and preserve himself from being questioned and sentenced from these and other his traiterous designs, from the first year of his now Majesty’s reign, until now, he hath laboured to subvert the rights of parliamentary proceedings, and to incense his Majesty against parliaments … .”